Speeding Tickets
Home Up

GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE
Colorado Springs, Colorado    El Paso County
Robert D. Gustafson  *  Attorney at Law  *  Colorado Springs

COLORADO SPRINGS SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE

Email Attorney 

Attorney Vita

Phone (719) 260-1002
Fax (719) 260-1003  **  Toll Free (800) 410-1002
Hours Consultation Terms

Fees & Costs

Retainer Documents Driving Directions Maps to Attorney Travel * Trade Area * Courts
 

COLORADO SPRINGS SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE
everything you never wanted to know about speeding ticket defense
Trial Practice 29+ years Colorado State Courts, Colorado Springs Municipal Court & Colorado DMV License Hearings & Appeals

ATTORNEY HOMEPAGE

SPEEDING - COUNTY COURT - STATE SPEEDING - MUNICIPAL COURT - CITY
Speed Limits - Colorado State Law
Maximum Lawful Speed
Colorado State Law - Preemption
Reasonable and Prudent Speed
El Paso County DA Office Inflexible Policy
Speed Limits - Colorado Springs Municipal Ordinances
General Information
speeding ticket defense - state court or municipal court
Traffic Engineer's Survey State Court Municipal Court
Notice - Signage Size & Placement Records Access - Discovery Fights
Traffic Cameras
"Smile !!! ..... You're on Candid Ticket"
Colorado DMV License Defense DMV License Reinstatement  
  DMV Proceedings Accident Reports & Colorado DMV Forms
Colorado State Accident Report CSPD Accident Cold Report
Potential Defenses Do I Need an Attorney?
ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS
 
Warning Right to Silence Search & Seizure Demeanor
Criminal Court Proceedings Felony Misdemeanor Municipal
Traffic Court Proceedings Traffic Infraction Traffic Offense Municipal
Deferred Sentencing Sentencing Defense  Criminal  *  Traffic  *  DMV
Traffic Definitions Bail Bond Remedial Links Completion Forms
Self Legal Research Accounting Legal Forms On-Line * Hardcopy
Retainer Docs Client Docs Laymen Advice Disclaimer Notice
Independent Service Providers Alternatives Find A Lawyer
Useful Public Service Remedial Traffic Safety Classes
ATTORNEY POLICIES
  Cases Outside Colorado Springs - Travel
 No Pro Bono Assistance  *  No Installment Payment
 Legal Advice Limited to Clients - Not General Public
 Representation Now - Another Attorney or Self
 Attorney Representation & Declined Matters
 No Post Sentencing - Revocation or Appeal
attorney does not accept criminal & traffic cases after sentencing unless he defended the underlying case
non-acceptance includes probation revocation, deferred sentence revocation, parole violation or appeal  **  eligible collateral attack cases accepted
 

Colorado Springs, Colorado, speeding ticket, defense, traffic ticket defense, traffic attorney, traffic lawyer, traffic defense attorney, traffic defense lawyer, Colorado Springs Municipal Court, Colorado state courts, statutes, municipal ordinances, law, reasonable & prudent speed, radar, vascar, laser, pace clock, speed, velocity, speed limits, preemption, traffic engineer, survey, Colorado Springs speeding tickets, Colorado Springs Municipal Court, Sate Court El Paso County Court, DMV points, discovery, defense information, attorney's fees and costs, Municipal Court Colorado Springs Colorado, Manitou Springs Municipal Court, Woodland Park Municipal Court, Cripple Creek Creek Municipal Court, Fountain Municipal Court, Calhan Municipal Court, Simla Municipal Court, Town of Simla Colorado, Court Simla Colorado, Pueblo Municipal Court, Castle Rock Municipal Court, Monument Municipal Court, Palmer Lake Municipal Court, Calhan Colorado, Simla Colorado, Denver Municipal Court, Aurora Municipal Court, Brighton Municipal Court, Broomfield Municipal Court, Centennial Municipal Court, Englewood Municipal Court, Federal Heights Municipal Court, Golden Municipal Court, Littleton Municipal Court, Sheridan Municipal Court, Thornton Municipal Court, Wheat Ridge Municipal Court, WheatRidge Municipal Court

Adobe Acrobat Reader version 5 or later is required to view .pdf files    Free Download

BASIC INFORMATION
please refer to the below links for basic information regarding defense of criminal & traffic cases

Right to Silence Search & Seizure Defendant Demeanor Bail Bond Independent Service Providers Advice from Laymen

GENERAL INFORMATION

        When a driver receives a speeding ticket, generally it is an inconvenience but nothing more.  If a civil traffic infraction in state court, early payment will result in point reduction.  If a criminal case, usually the prosecutor will negotiate a least a point off the offense charged, perhaps more.  Prosecutors may agree to reduce the ticket to a 2 point defective vehicle or 0 point obstructed rear window which won't likely excite the insurance company.  After payment of fine and costs, and crossing guard surcharge in Municipal Court, life moves on.  It is worthwhile to appear in Court on the summons date to receive the benefit of plea negotiations.  Usually counsel is not involved.

        Simple is not always the case.  If the ticket will cause loss of driver's license or driving privileges in Colorado, or cancellation of insurance or significant premium hike, or perhaps a CDL will be affected and therefore livelihood, then matters become different.

        Regarding DUI cases there's an old saying: 
                I don't have a drinking problem
                I drink
                I get drunk
                I fall down
                No problem

         Many people view speeding similarly - simple.  Like DUI defense, there is significantly more to it.  I have therefore included significant amount of information for those with problematic cases or those who are like the monkey, Curious George.

 

Elements of this speeding are driving a motor vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing or over the maximum lawful speed.

 
STATE COURT TRAFFIC INFRACTION State Court  Early Payment Point Reduction
Muni Court  NO Early Payment Point Reduction
State Court Possible Penalties Presumptive Jail Presumptive Fines Points  ***
Adult and Juvenile Minimum   Maximum Minimum   Maximum Scheduled Points
0 -4 mph over the limit * None None $15 $100 $15 + $2 0
5 - 9 mph over the limit * None None $15 $100 $35 + $5 1
10 - 19 mph over the limit * None None $15 $100 $50 + $8 4
20 - 24 mph over the limit * None None $15 $100 $100 + $15 6
Failure to Reduce Speed - Special Hazard * None None $15 $100 $35 + $5 3
**  STATE COURT TRAFFIC OFFENSE
**** court appearance required
NO Early Payment Point Reduction
 
State Court Possible Penalties Presumptive Jail Presumptive Fines Points  ***
Adult and Juvenile Minimum   Maximum Minimum   Maximum Scheduled Points
25-39 mph over the limit **  **** 0 days 90 days $10 $300 court order 6
40+ mph over the limit **  **** 0 days 90 days $10 $300 court order 12
*** Points - not applicable to bicycle or motorized bicycle

SPEED LIMITS - COLORADO STATE LAW
Maximum Lawful Speed
Colorado State Law - Preemption
Reasonable and Prudent Speed
may not be so reasonable or prudent
   
attorney notation: multiple sections have been omitted or summarized for brevity - refer to statutes for full text

        The elements of this offense are driving a motor vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.  Special hazards such as snow, rain, construction, or other attendant circumstances may effect the reasonable and prudent speed.

Maximum Lawful Speed

Colorado has one lawful speed limit - 75 miles per hour.  All other "speed limits" are merely prima facie evidence of reasonable and prudent speed.  See below statute. CRS 42-4-1101(8) ¶¶ (b) & (c)

****************************** ****************************** ******************************

Reasonable and Prudent Speed
may not be so reasonable or prudent

CRS 42-4-1101(2) 
        Except when a special hazard exists that requires a lower speed, the following speeds shall be lawful:
        (a) Twenty miles per hour on narrow, winding mountain highways or on blind curves;
        (b) Twenty-five miles per hour in any business district, as defined in section 42-1-102 (11);
        (c) Thirty miles per hour in any residence district, as defined in section 42-1-102 (80);
        (d) Forty miles per hour on open mountain highways;
        (e) Forty-five miles per hour for all vehicles in the business of transporting trash, where higher speeds are posted, when said vehicle is loaded as an exempted vehicle pursuant to section 42-4-507 (3);
        (f) Fifty-five miles per hour on other open highways which are not on the interstate system, as defined in section 43-2-101 (2), and are not surfaced, four-lane freeways or expressways;
        (g) Sixty-five miles per hour on surfaced, four-lane highways which are on the interstate system, as defined in section 43-2-101 (2), or are freeways or expressways;
        (h) Any speed not in excess of a speed limit designated by an official traffic control device.

CRS 42-4-1101(4)
        Any speed in excess of the lawful speeds set forth in CRS 42-4-1101(2) shall be prima facie evidence that such speed was not reasonable or prudent under the conditions then existing. "Prima facie evidence" means evidence which is sufficient proof that the speed was not reasonable or prudent under the conditions then existing, and which will remain sufficient proof of such fact, unless contradicted and overcome by evidence bearing upon the question of whether or not the speed was reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.

        That means a rebuttable presumption presumption is created that the maximum safe speed is that which was designated - but the presumption can be overcome.  No speed limit in Colorado is an absolute speed limit except 75 miles per hour.  CRS 42-4-1101 (7) creates an exception - any city or town may by ordinance adopt absolute speed limits as the maximum lawful speed limits in its jurisdiction.  See preemption below.

So, what does all this jibberish this mean?
   
     An attack can be made on the reasonable and prudent "speed limit"
                Traffic engineer's office didn't do a traffic survey when adopting the reasonable and prudent "speed limit" or the survey was inadequate.
                Notice was inadequate
        If not properly adopted with a valid traffic survey and properly posted, the "speed limit" becomes the absolute speed limit of 75 miles per hour.  This may end the case if the driver's speed is alleged below 75 mph.
 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************

CRS 42-4-1101(8)
                (b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, no person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed in excess of a maximum lawful speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour.
                (c) The speed limit set forth in paragraph (b) of this subsection (8) is the maximum lawful speed limit and is not subject to the provisions of subsection (4) of this section. (prima facie evidence of reasonable and prudent speed)  
                (e) The provisions of this subsection (8) are declared to be matters of both local and statewide concern requiring uniform compliance throughout the state.
                (f) In every charge of a violation of paragraph (b) of this subsection (8), the complaint, summons and complaint, or penalty assessment notice shall specify the speed at which the defendant is alleged to have driven and also the maximum lawful speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour.
        (9) The conduct of a driver of a vehicle which would otherwise constitute a violation of this section is justifiable and not unlawful when:
                (a) It is necessary as an emergency measure to avoid an imminent public or private injury which is about to occur by reason of a situation occasioned or developed through no conduct of said driver and which is of sufficient gravity that, according to ordinary standards of intelligence and morality, the desirability and urgency of avoiding the injury clearly outweigh the desirability of avoiding the consequences sought to be prevented by this section; or
                (b) With respect to authorized emergency vehicles, the applicable conditions for exemption, as set forth in CRS 42-4-108, exist.
        (10) The minimum requirement for commission of a traffic infraction or misdemeanor traffic offense under this section is the performance by a driver of prohibited conduct, which includes a voluntary act or the omission to perform an act which said driver is physically capable of performing.
        (11) It shall not be a defense to prosecution for a violation of this section that:
                (a) The defendant's conduct was not performed intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence; or
                (b) The defendant's conduct was performed under a mistaken belief of fact, including, but not limited to, a mistaken belief of the defendant regarding the speed of the defendant's vehicle; or
                (c) The defendant's vehicle has a greater operating or fuel-conserving efficiency at speeds greater than the reasonable and prudent speed under the conditions then existing or at speeds greater than the maximum lawful speed limit.
        (12) A violation of driving one to twenty-four miles per hour in excess of the reasonable and prudent speed or in excess of the maximum lawful speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour is a class A traffic infraction; a violation of driving twenty-five or more miles per hour in excess of the reasonable and prudent speed or in excess of the maximum lawful speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense; and a violation under subsection (3) of this section is a class A traffic infraction.

****************************** ****************************** ******************************

Preemption

CRS 42-4-1101(7) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of subsection (2) of this section, any city or town may by ordinance adopt absolute speed limits as the maximum lawful speed limits in its jurisdiction, and such speed limits shall not be subject to the provisions of subsection (4) of this section.

CRS 42-4-1101(8)(d) State and local authorities within their respective jurisdictions shall not authorize any speed limit which exceeds seventy-five miles per hour on any highway.

Municipalities and Counties adopt ordinances.
        Municipal Codes or Ordinances
        County Codes or Ordinances
        Many smaller towns or counties with limited budgets adopt the model traffic code (MTC)
        Local authorities may adopt by reference all or any part of a model traffic code which embodies 
                the rules of the road and vehicle requirements set forth in state law.  CRS 42-4-110(b)
        To this attorney's knowledge, adoption of the MTC does not eliminate the traffic survey requirement.
            To find the ordinance in your area, run a search engine such as Google, search:
                model traffic code and add the name of the town or county
            An example would be
El Paso County Model Traffic Code

        With respect to cities and towns, the general preemption statute is controlled by the specific exception contained in CRS 42-4-1101 (7).  Cities and towns may adopt absolute speed limits below 75 miles per hour.  If stopped in a small "town" (Boondocks, USA) which may not be incorporated, it would be worth investigating whether it qualified as a "town" under the statutes.  I've never had the issue arise, but it would be worth researching the law further if relevant.

        With respect to counties, no such exception is provided in CRS 42-4-1101 (7).  It is this attorney's belief that counties are preempted from enacting ordinances at variance with state law, including the inability to adopt a maximum lawful speed below 75 miles per hour.

Colorado EL PASO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY POLICY State Court

As of August, 2010 the El Paso County DA Office has a policy as follows regarding 6 point speeding offenses charged as 25 - 39 mph over the limit.  Prosecutors will agree to reduce 6 point speed to a 4 point traffic infraction speed upon proof of completion of Level 2 traffic safety class.  Early completion of a traffic safety class or public service are irrelevant - no DDA discretion is exercised.  A driver doesn't need to pay an attorney to proceed through an automated, inflexible policy process.  Don't bother to call counsel for assistance with plea negotiation - it's fruitless now.  If that DA Office policy of 4 point speeding conviction disposition is unacceptable to you as a driver and you plan to retain counsel, plan on a jury trial with attendant quote of trial fees & costs which would be payable at the time retained.  Put another way - either turn me loose to fight the DA Office through motions and jury trial, or don't waste my time and your money attempting unlikely settlement outside prosecutors' inflexible policy parameters.

 

The City of Colorado Springs has lowered the speed limit to 25 mph on all roads where not otherwise posted and has adopted an ordinance imposing a fine of $10 per mile over the lawful speed limit.  The ticket may be plea bargained down to a lesser speed for purposes of points, however the fine will be based upon the initial alleged speed.

Remind anyone of taxation or a source of revenue to avoid the Tabor Act?

 
MUNICIPAL COURT TRAFFIC OFFENSE NO Early Payment Point Reduction
Colorado Springs Municipal Court Possible Penalties Adult Minor
Jail 10 - 90 days  0 - 10 days
Fine  $10 - $500 $10 - $500
Points against Colorado Driving Privileges 1- 12 Points 1 - 12 Points
 
Colorado Springs Municipal Court has NOT adopted early payment point reduction
early payment will result is assessment of full points charged

SPEEDING

COLORADO SPRINGS MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES

Municipal Court Proceedings - Traffic Offenses
synopsis of how cases progress through the municipal court system

attorney notation: multiple sections may have been omitted or summarized for brevity - refer to ordinances for full text

10.5.101: REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED; SPECIAL HAZARDS:
        A. It shall be unlawful for any person to drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and hazards, actual and potential, then existing.
   
     B. The fact that the speed of a vehicle is lower than the limits established in this chapter shall not relieve the driver of the duty to decrease speed when a special hazard exists with respect to pedestrians, animals, property or other traffic by reason of weather, traffic, roadway conditions or any other actual or potential hazard then existing. It shall be unlawful for any person to fail to decrease speed given the presence of any hazard. (1968 Code §§6-5-1, 6-5-2; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42) 

10.5.102 UNPOSTED SPEED LIMITS
        Where speed limits are not posted, and where no special hazard exists, the following speed shall be lawful but it shall be unlawful for any person to drive at any speed in excess of the limits:
                A. Twenty five (25) miles per hour on streets and highways;
                B. Fifteen (15) miles per hour in alleys. 
                Effective 2003
                (1968 Code §§6-5-1, 6-5-2; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42; Ord. 03-49) 
        This constitutes an amendment from the former speed limits which are no longer applicable

10.5.103: POSTED SPEED LIMITS:
        A. It is hereby determined that the speed limits stated in section 10.5.102 of this article are the maximum reasonable and safe speed limits in each zone, except where the City Traffic Engineer determines on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any speed limit set forth in section 10.5.102 of this article is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist at any intersection or other place or upon any parts of any street or highway, in which case the Traffic Engineer shall determine and declare a reasonable and safe maximum speed limit not to exceed fifty five (55) miles per hour which shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice are erected at the intersection or other place or part of the street or highway.
        B. Appropriate signs giving notice that the speed limit set forth in section 10.5.102 of this article is the maximum speed may be posted by the Traffic Engineer.
        C. Whenever posted speed limits are established in accord with this section, the speed limits shall be recorded as provided in section 10.1.312 of this chapter.
        D. It is hereby determined that the posted speed limits determined, posted and recorded are the maximum reasonable or safe speed limits at the locations.
        E. It is hereby determined that the speed of twenty (20) miles per hour is the maximum reasonable and safe speed in school zones, and the Traffic Engineer shall establish speed zones by posting appropriate signs giving notice thereof in lieu of the requirements of this section. (1968 Code §§6-5-2, 6-5-3; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 79-32; Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42) 

10.5.104: EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED LIMIT:
        It shall be unlawful for any person to drive any vehicle:
                A. One to four (4) miles per hour over the posted speed limit;
                B. Five (5) to nine (9) miles per hour over the posted speed limit;
                C. Ten (10) to nineteen (19) miles per hour over the maximum posted speed limit;
                D. Twenty (20) to thirty nine (39) miles per hour over the posted limit;
                E. Forty (40) miles per hour or more over the maximum posted speed limit. (Ord. 98-249; Ord. 00-112; Ord. 01-42) 

10.5.105: NOTICE CHARGING SPEED VIOLATION:
        In every charge of a violation relating to speed limits, the complaint or summons or notice to appear shall specify the speed at which the defendant is alleged to have driven and the speed limit applicable within the district or at the location of the City. (1968 Code §6-5-5; Ord. 77-69; Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42) 

10.5.106: MINIMUM SPEED REGULATIONS:
        A. No person shall drive a motor vehicle on any street at a slow speed as to impede or block the normal and reasonable forward movement of traffic, except when a reduced speed shall be necessary for safe operation of the vehicle or in compliance with law.
        B. It is hereby determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that slow speeds on certain streets described in traffic control records as provided in section 10.1.312 of this chapter consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic on the facilities described in the records and it is declared that the minimum speed limit upon those streets or expressways shall be as stated, which speed so declared shall be effective at the time specified when signs are erected giving notice. Any speed less than the minimum speed limit shall be prima facie evidence that the lesser speed is unlawful, except when a reduced speed shall be necessary for the safe operation of the vehicle when a special hazard exists. (1968 Code §6-5-6; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 85-263; Ord. 88-151; Ord. 01-42) 

10.5.107: SPEED CONTESTS:
        A. No person shall engage in any motor vehicle speed or acceleration contest or exhibition of speed or acceleration on a street or highway, and no person shall aid or abet in any motor vehicle speed or acceleration contest or exhibition on any street.
        B. No person shall for the purpose of facilitating or aiding or as an incident to any motor vehicle speed or acceleration contest upon a street or public right of way in any manner obstruct or place any barricade, obstruction, starting or timing device or assist or participate in placing any barricade, obstruction, starting or timing device upon any street or public right of way. (1968 Code §6-5-7; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 01-42) 

10.5.109: EMERGENCY VEHICLES EXEMPT FROM SPEED LIMITS:
        A. The speed limitations set forth in this article shall not apply to an authorized emergency vehicle when the driver is responding to an emergency call and is making use of visual and audible signals as prescribed by law, nor shall speed limitations apply to a police vehicle while in actual pursuit of a suspected violator of any provision of this chapter or any other law so long as the pursuit is being made to obtain verification of or evidence of the guilt of the suspected violator or to apprehend the suspected violator.
        B. The provisions of subsection A of this section shall not relieve the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons using the street, nor shall the provisions protect the driver of any vehicle from the consequences of a reckless disregard for the safety of others. (1968 Code §6-5-9; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 01-42) 

10.5.110: DEFENSES:
        The minimum requirement for commission of a violation of this chapter is the performance by the driver of prohibited conduct, which includes a voluntary act or the omission to perform an act which the driver is physically capable of performing. It shall not be a defense to prosecution for violation of this article that:
                A. The defendant's conduct was not performed intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence; or
                B. The defendant's conduct was performed under a mistaken belief of fact, including, but not limited to, a mistaken belief regarding the speed of the defendant's vehicle. (Ord. 90-24; Ord. 01-42) 

Robert D. Gustafson
Attorney At Law
Colorado Springs, Colorado

Phone (719) 260-1002

Fax (719) 260-1003

Toll Free (800) 410-1002

Surrounding Area
MUNICIPAL COURTS
SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE

TRAVEL TIME & MILEAGE
Billed Outside El Paso County
 
Colorado State Courts
Billed Outside El Paso County

Southern Colorado

Metro Denver Area
Colorado Springs Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Colorado Springs, Colorado
Calhan Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Calhan, Colorado
Denver City & County Traffic Court
Traffic Court - Denver, Colorado
Denver City & County Criminal Court
Criminal Court - Denver, Colorado
Canon City Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Canon City, Colorado
Castle Rock Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Castle Rock, Colorado
Aurora Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Aurora, Colorado
Brighton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Brighton, Colorado
Cripple Creek Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Cripple Creek, Colorado
Fairplay Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Fairplay, Colorado
Broomfield Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Broomfield, Colorado
Centennial Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Centennial, Colorado
Florence Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Florence, Colorado
Fountain Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Fountain, Colorado
Englewood Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Englewood, Colorado
Federal Heights Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Federal Heights, Colorado
Manitou Springs Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Manitou Springs, Colorado
Monument Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Monument, Colorado
Golden Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Golden, Colorado
Littleton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Littleton, Colorado
Palmer Lake Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Palmer Lake, Colorado
Pueblo Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Pueblo, Colorado
Sheridan Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Sheridan, Colorado
Thornton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Thornton, Colorado
Simla Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Simla, Colorado
Woodland Park Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Woodland Park, Colorado
Wheat Ridge Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Municipal Ordinances and Codes
Colorado Model Traffic Code

        NOTICE: It is the policy of the presiding judge in Palmer Lake Municipal Court not to accept negotiated plea settlements.  If charges are filed in this court, counsel must prepare for trial; trial fees and costs would be quoted.

        Municipal courts do not have the availability of e-Filing as do state district courts, however some of the local area smaller municipal courts have now come into the 21st century by accepting pleadings and filings via email and payment of fines and costs via bank on-line bill pay.  Depending upon court policy regarding entry of plea via email and e-payment subsequent to negotiation without the necessity of physical appearance, travel time & mileage may possibly be avoided.  Not all courts permit this.

        A judge or magistrate may not let the issue go to a jury (lack of prima facie evidence) unless there is mechanical support (radar, vascar, pace clock or laser) for the visual estimate.  In a trial to the court, I've seen a judge stop the case when the officer admitted the ticket was based only upon a visual estimate.  Other judges may proceed.

VELOCITY AND SPEED

In general terms, velocity and speed mean the same thing: the distance moved in a unit of time.
        Velocity is ordinarily expressed in feet per second.
        Speed is more commonly used with reference to motor vehicles, is measured in miles and hours and speedometers are made to read in miles per hour.

  1. In speeding or stop-sign / stoplight cases, sometimes seconds (or fractions of a second) become relevant to the officer’s opportunity to observe or calculation error.

  2. This is particularly true in cross-examining an officer who conducted a vascar clock or pace clock in a speeding case, or can be devastating to the officer’s credibility in cross-examination of a stop sign / red light observation.

  3. Accident investigation reports commonly express velocity (feet per second). Conversion is necessary to understand the accident report or review the credibility of the accident investigation.

  4. Therefore, one must be able to convert miles per hour into feet per second.

****************************** ****************************** ******************************
     
CONVERSION
Speed to Velocity
Miles Per Hour To Feet Per Second

Miles per hour can be changed to feet per second by multiplying the number of miles per hour by the feet in a mile (5,280) and dividing by the seconds in an hour (3,600). This is approximately equivalent to multiplying miles per hour by 1.47 (which is 5,280 / 3,600 to two decimal places).

Mathematical Formula
v = 1.47s
v = velocity (feet per second)
s - speed (miles per hour)

Example

60mph = 5,280 / 3,600 = 88 ft per sec exactly or

60mph = 60 x 1.47 = 88.2 feet per second approximately

Rough estimates: miles per hour can be multiplied by 1.5
Put another way, half the number is added to the number

Example

60mph = 60 x 1.5 = 90 ft per see, approximately or

60 mph plus 30 mph (half that amount) = 90 ft per sec, approximately

 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************
     
CONVERSION
Velocity to Speed
Feet Per Second
To Miles Per Hour

Feet per second can be changed to miles per hour by multiplying by the seconds in an hour (3,600) and dividing by the feet in a mile (5,280). This is approximately equivalent to dividing by 1.47 or multiplying by 0.682 (3,600 / 5,280 to three decimal places)

Mathematical Formula
s = v / 1.47  or  s = 0.682v
v = velocity (feet per second)
s - speed (miles per hour)

Example

66 ft per sec = 66 x 3,600 / 5,280 = 45 mph exactly or

66 feet per second = 66 x 0.682 = 45.0 mph approximately

Rough estimates: miles per hour is two thirds of feet per second

Example

two thirds of 66 feet per second is 44 miles per hour approximately or

66 feet per second = 66 x 2 = 132 / 3 = 44.0 mph approximately

66 feet per second = 66 x 0.682 = 45.0 mph approximately

Multiplying by 2/3 (0.6667) is roughly the same as dividing by 1.5

Example

66 feet per second = 66 / 1.5 44.0 mph approximately

MEASUREMENT OF SPEED
REQUIREMENT OF EVIDENCE

        A judge or magistrate may not let the issue go to a jury (lack of prima facie evidence) unless there is mechanical support (radar, vascar, pace clock or laser) for the visual estimate.  In a trial to the court, I've seen a judge stop the case when the officer admitted the ticket was based only upon a visual estimate.  Other judges may proceed.

MEASUREMENT OF SPEED
VISUAL ESTIMATE

        As a part of radar or vascar training, officers must make visual estimates of speed.  To become certified and receive a wallet certification card, each must accurately estimate speeds:
        "On the sit"    10 estimates plus or minus 3 miles per hour
        "On the move"  5 estimates plus or minus 5 miles per hour

To quote the TV credit card commercial: "What's in your wallet?"
Hopefully, the officer doesn't possess the certification card and it's not "To the neighbors!"

MEASUREMENT OF SPEED
RADAR

        State patrol troopers, city police and county deputy sheriff's typically have access to radar devices.

DEFINITIONS AS APPLIED TO RADAR TERMINOLOGY
testing officer's radar knowledge

  1. Batching: Effect caused by rapid acceleration or deceleration of patrol vehicle while obtaining a clock using moving radar. Patrol speed calculation is not accurate, causing faulty target reading.

  2. Target Bumping: Same as batching.

  3. Multiple Bounce: Radar beam is bounced off a radar reflective object. Several various effects mat be noted, depending upon circumstances.
            a. Patrol speed is doubled and presented in target window. No reading in patrol window (moving radar).
            b. Radar beam bounces off a building, sign, etc., to clock a target approaching from the rear instead of to the front. (moving or stationary. Not too frequent in moving mode, but possible.)
            c. Radar Beam bounces off reflective surfaces to clock a target over a hillcrest or around a curve in a canyon. The clock may be quite accurate, but is invalid due to no tracking history.
           

  4. Own Speed Capture: (Moving mode only) Patrol and target speed identical in the absence of a target vehicle.

  5. Shadowing: Effect noted when patrol speed is referenced from a moving object. Patrol window shows opening or closing speed between moving object and adds the difference between false and true patrol speed onto target's speed.

  6. Panning or Scanning: As defined by Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, both imply movement. As applied to CLETA Radar Instruction, either term describes moving the radar antenna to follow a target, "Quick-Draw" movement, etc.

  7. Feedback Effect: Caused by aiming radar antenna at or across readout portion of control module. May result in high readings or unusual audio or both. (D.O.T. calls this panning)

  8. Cosine Factor: Effect noted when an angle exists between the radar and a target. Effect on target speed varies according to circumstances.
            a. Stationary Radar - Always favors target vehicle. Displayed speed is less than true speed.
            b. Moving Radar - If no cosine angle exists on patrol speed, any cosine effect favors the target vehicle.
            c. Moving Radar - If a cosine angle is present on patrol speed, the error in patrol speed is added to the target vehicle's speed.

  9. Interference: Accidental introduction of a false signal into a radar may be natural or man made in origin.

  10. Jamming: Deliberate introduction of a signal to cause a false radar reading or to prevent any reading at all from being displayed.

  11. Low Speed Combining: (Moving Radar Only) Effect noted when radar combines patrol and target speed and gives the speed in the patrol window. No target reading is present. Usually happens at or below low end of moving radar operating limit. (Older officers trained by manufacturer may refer to this as Low Speed Batching.)

  12. Cosine Factor - Angle Error
           
    Error is linked to angle.
            v = Actual velocity
            va = Apparent velocity (what radar sees)
            va = v (cos 0)

 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************

CERTIFICATION * CALIBRATION * SET UP
radar speed enforcement

  1. Preferable to voir dire officer prior to introduction of speed reading
            Alternative: cross examination

  2. Accuracy of unit
            Manufacture's certificate of accuracy
                Prosecutors will likely attempt to introduce 
                Manufacturer is likely not a governmental agency, therefore not a government document under seal.  
                Certificate is subject to the hearsay objection.
            Tuning fork(s) 
                One tuning fork certified by the Colorado Dept. of Agriculture, Div. of Weights & Measures
                certification date within one year prior to the stop People v. Walker, 610 P.2d 496 (Colo.1980)
                certification date within one year before or after the stop People v. McIntyre, 719 P.2d 727, 729 (Colo.1986)
                        
                    Two tuning forks of different speed calibrations - neither one certified
            By running a vehicle with a calibrated speedometer through radar
            By concurrent speed check of a vehicle by radar and by vascar
            Timing of accuracy check 
                Reasonable time before and after operation to insure proper functioning.  People v. Walker, 610 P.2d 496, 498 (Colo.1980); People v. McIntyre, 719 P.2d 727, 729 (Colo.1986)
                At place where defendant was arrested and immediately prior thereto.  City of St. Louis v. Boecker, 370 S.W.2d 731 (Mo App. 1963), Royals v. Commonwealth, 198 VA 876, 96 S.E. 2d 812(Ct. App. 1957)
                At and near the time of the stop.  
                Due to impracticality of using a second calibrated speedometer or separate vascar unit on location, accuracy is usually verified by tuning fork(s).

  3. Law enforcement agency FCC license.
            Can be discovered
            Dates of issuance and expiration
            If not current, the unit is being operated unlawfully.  
            FCC license generally runs on a 2 or 5 year cycle.

  4. Maintenance and recalibration
            Exact nature of repair.
            Dates of repair
            Dates of recalibration - preferably within 6 months
            Identity and qualification of technician
            Hearsay objection

  5. Radar unit frequency
            Pulse radar (similar to military - can track multiple targets) - I've not seen in Colorado
            Doppler radar - S Band, X Band, K Band
                S Band no longer used in Colorado
                X Band 10,525 MHz
                K Band 24,150 MHz

  6. Tuning forks
            Stamped on fork(s): 
                speed corresponding to fork
                Serial Number
                Manufacturer
                Frequency: X or K Band
            Frequency correspond to unit - X Band or K Band
            Speed correspond to fork
            Serial number & manufacturer
            Tines
                damage, dents or dings - Walker, supra at 499
                Position relative to unit
                    Distance from radar antenna 1" - 2"
                    Horizontal or vertical placement - harmonics

    Tine Direction Placement
    Improper harmonics    {__}

    Proper harmonics

       | 
          |     | 

                Activation
                    Striking metal object - improper harmonics
                    Striking too hard results in next harmonic and higher speed
                    May damage or dent tines
                    Two forks simultaneously - 80 & 50 = 30
                    Antenna direction and possible other targets during accuracy test.
                    Readings on accuracy test
                        Each fork
                        Patrol window and target window
                        Steady, flashing, no reading, fluctuating
                Verification of subtracters in moving radar
                    2 forks simultaneously; i.e.: 80 and 50 = 30
            Time of accuracy test(s) 
                Reasonable time before & after operation to ensure functioning properly
                    Walker, supra at 498
                At place where defendant arrested and immediately prior to
                    City of St. Louis v. Boecker, 370 S.W. 2d 731 (Mo. App. 1963)
                    Royals v. Commonwealth, 198 VA. 876, 96 S.E.2d 812 (Ct. App. ___)
            Operation of accuracy test
                Antenna direction and other possible targets during accuracy test
                Readings on accuracy test
                Each fork; patrol window and target window
                Steady, flashing, no reading, fluctuating

  7. Interference
            Heater fan
            Power source
                Direct to car battery, cigarette lighter, portable battery pack
                Shielded cable from power source to battery
                    If none - engine and electrical interference
            Multiple cables twisted - antenna, power and remote
                Induction coil effect
                Increase in speed reading

  8. Damage 
            Antenna - effect signal received
            Cords - exposed wires 

  9. Inspection date of arrest?
            (suck in antenna or diodes and amplify)

  10. Location:
            Microwave transmitters Radio, CB, Amateur base stations
               
    e.g. KBPI ROCKS THE ROCKIES
           
    Power lines - high voltage
            Hospital, Doctor, Chiropractor, Dentist: X-Ray
            Service Station, banks, business:
            Neon or Fluorescent Light
            Generators
            ARC Welding Equipment

  11. Routine procedure on/off plug in radar device
            Self
            Other officers
            Procedure utilized by officer on/off when plug in radar device on date of arrest

  12. Round off vs. lop off by device; i.e.: 49.4 or 49.6 mph
            Speed reported 49 or 50 mph
            Sufficiency of evidence

  13. Calibration by running another unit through zone of influence
            Hearsay objection unless other officer present and testifies

  14. Calibration of squad car speedometer
            Tachometer and mechanic testimony required + maintenance records
            Stop watch: WWV Bureau check (National Bureau - Boulder) 
            Radar device; same unit bootstrapping or another radar device

 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************
 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************

OPERATION AND USE
radar speed enforcement

  1. Preferable to voir dire officer prior to introduction of speed reading
            Alternative: cross examination

  2. Visual estimate of speed of Defendant's vehicle
            Reinforce lack of certification re visual estimation
            Distance of Defendant's vehicle at estimation of speed
            Length of time of observation prior to speed estimation
            Obstructions to vision
            Time of day of citation
            Light or dark

  3. Weather date of stop
            Rain, sleet, snow, blowing dirt/sand/debris

  4. Number of vehicles in each lane and each direction of travel

  5. Describe defendant's vehicle

  6. Describe other vehicles in proximity to Defendant's vehicle

  7. Audio (Speedgun 8, K-55, MR-7, MR99, HR-8, K-911)
            On/Off
            Volume
            Doppler signal strength
            Detection of interference or other vehicles
            Describe sound
            TV or Radio test pattern
            pitch vary with speed of target
            volume vary with speed of target

  8. Round off vs. lop off by device; i.e.: 49.4 or 49.6
            Speed unknown; insufficient evidence

  9. Identification of terms and effect on radar device:
            Ghosting: weak signal or multiple bounce
            Shadowing: beam bounce off reflective object (trunk) add patrol to D.
            Low speed Combining: combine target & patrol in patrol window.
            Multiple Bounce: i.e.. buildings in town
            Panning: move stationary unit increase speed reading (stationary).
            Batching: rapid acceleration/deceleration of radar car (moving mode).
                radar device unable to interpret
            Cosine Error: angle of antenna to target (stationary unit or mode).
                45 Degree: 100 mph = 70 mph
                30 Degree: 100 mph = 86 mph Aim 500'_750" = 5 Degree
                20 Degree: 100 mph = 93 mph Lift.
                10 Degree: 100 mph = 98 mph
            Scanning: move stationary unit increase speed reading
                arc = 2_3 mph "Quick Draw"
                push =10 mph
                Same as panning
            Target Bumping
                Same as batching
            Feedback Effect: aim antenna at or across readout
                window ==> high reading.
            Interference: accidental false signal
            Jamming: deliberate introduction of false signal
            Own Speed Capture: Moving mode; own speed in patrol & target window.
            Beam shape
                Wedge from antenna - angle?
                NO: CIGAR SHAPE
                How identify target if unaware of beam shape and targets in zone
            Log of checks personal diary or journal
            Target distance

  10. Accuracy
            Maximum distance with accuracy
            Minimum distance with accuracy

  11. Interference
            Heater fan: false reading or shorten beam range
            Power source: direct to car battery, cigarette lighter, portable battery pack.
                Cigarette lighter = engine & all electrical interference
                Ignition alternator AC alternating current interference
            Shielded cable from power source to battery: hearsay
                engine & electrical interference *Panel instruments in in patrol car.
            Multiple cables twisted; antenna, power and remote control
                    Induction coil effect=increase speed reading
            Damage to antenna: effect signal received
            Damage to cords; exposed wires Inspection date of arrest
                suck in antenna or diodes and amplify

  12. Location:
           
    Microwave transmitters; radio, CB, Amateur base stations, e.g. KBPI ROCKS THE ROCKIES
            High voltage power lines: how does officer check effect
            Hospital, doctor, dentist, chiropractors: X-ray
            Service station, banks, business: Neon Fluorescent Light
            Generators
            Arc welding equipment

  13. Effect of weather
            Wind, rain, snow, blowing sand or debris

  14. Buildings or reflective signs or burglar alarms
            Around curve: bounce off power lines
            Behind: bounce mirror

  15. Area and traffic: size area and amount of traffic
            position, mass, speed of other

  16. Moving or stationary mode

  17. Automatic lock: first speed exceed threshold entered
            failure to release: improper speed for defendant.
            Lock, automatic or manual
                failure to release prior target reading - no relationship to defendant
                inadvertent error (naturally)

  18. "Out in front and nearest radar"
            Target not always lead car: speed, position & mass

  19. Experience at location
            Number of times set up at specific location

  20. Moving mode
            Comparison patrol window to speedometer
            Calibration of patrol car speedometer
                hearsay unless mechanic testifies

  21. Repair of vehicle transmission or radar device
            re-certification -  Hearsay

  22. Beam absorption - inaccurate patrol window reading (reduced)
            Loose gravel, sand, tall grass
            Moving grass, trees or "stationary objects" increase patrol window.

  23. IF UNAWARE OF LIMITATIONS OF RADAR, HOW DO YOU COMPENSATE?
           
    Reason enforce prima facie speed

  24. Conditions which rendered defendant's speed unreasonable & imprudent or dangerous
            Have Officer SPECIFY EXACT CONDITIONS - probably can't

MEASUREMENT OF SPEED
VASCAR

        I have defended vascar tickets against the Colorado State Patrol, but have not seen vascar usage by any city police or county deputy sheriff's.  

        Have you ever seen those broad white lines painted on the shoulder of the road running perpendicular to the lane of travel?  Ever wonder what they are?  Hello vascar.

        Vascar usage:

  1. Typical - set up at a freeway on-ramp or bridge 
            White marker lines are easily visible to the officer
            Freeway entrance ramps give easy access to the target vehicle
            Periodically chase motorcycles may be placed further down the road

  2. Moving mode while the trooper is traveling 
            Cruiser can be traveling the same or opposite direction as the target vehicle

  3. Ever seen those signs "Speed Monitored by Aircraft?"  Hello vascar
            Typically there is a chase cruiser somewhere nearby

        Vascar measures time and distance - the very definition of speed - tough to defend this case.  Here, conversion - speed to velocity, feet and fractions of a second regarding entry / exit from the measured distance are critical in cross-examination to attack the officer's / deputy's / trooper's credibility and the actual measurement evidence of defendant's speed.

****************************** ****************************** ******************************

Examination: Trooper "on the sit"

  1. Training and experience with unit

  2. Training, experience and certification re visual speed estimates
            Can trooper produce a wallet certification card?

  3. Markers
            Initial marker measurement
            Whether the trooper was physically present
            Whether the tape measure or rolling tape was certified by the Colorado Dept. of Highways
            Actual markers imbedded at the time of measurement
            Whether the trooper was physically present when the markers were painted
            Whether the paint markers were properly placed upon the imbedded markers
            Condition of paint - visibility
            Weather and road conditions - visibility

  4. Trooper's location and opportunity to observe
            Interference or distraction by other traffic or obstructions
            Preferable to view scene

  5. Location of defendant's vehicle as it entered measured zone
            Vascar activation at front bumper
            Vascar activation at rear bumper
            Vascar activation by use of vehicle shadows
                Shadow produces more accurate measure than use of vehicle body part

  6. Location of defendant's vehicle as it exited measured zone
            Vascar activation at front bumper
            Vascar activation at rear bumper
            Vascar activation by use of vehicle shadows

  7. Trooper's reflexes
            Actual time available to activate depending upon alleged speed
            Velocity computation to obtain fraction of a second

  8. Using velocity computation, elicit admissions as to effect of reflect error or visual error

  9. Calibration, maintenance and repair of vascar unit

****************************** ****************************** ******************************

Examination: Trooper "on the move"

  1. Training and experience with unit

  2. Very similar to above, except

  3. Calibration of patrol vehicle speedometer
            see hearsay objections and mechanic's testimony in radar above

  4. Stationary objects chosen as "measured distance" for vascar distance computation

  5. Shadow becomes more critical as distances are usually short

  6. Shortened distance increases speed error based upon reflex shortcoming or visual error

MEASUREMENT OF SPEED
PACE CLOCK

        Pace clock is fairly common.  The best defense is disqualification of testimony based upon cruiser speedometer lack of certification or failure of prosecutors to provide discovery prior to trial.

Examination 

  1. Cruiser speedometer calibration
            Qualified mechanic using a tachometer - insufficient foundation
                Hearsay objection unless mechanic testifies and produces maintenance records
            Officer may attempt to testify cruiser was run through vascar or radar
                Hearsay objection unless other officer present to testify
                Officer's radar or vascar qualifications, tuning fork(s), monitored speed
                    See radar and vascar defenses - hearsay objections
                    Multiple levels of hearsay regarding actual accuracy of measuring unit
            Discovery objections if documents were not produced prior to trial
            Unless certified accurate, the officer's testimony may likely be excluded

  2. Reasonable distance neither gained nor lost distance between cruiser and defendant
            Object to reasonableness of distance - insufficient to establish reliable clock
            Officer's judgment re neither gained nor lost distance between vehicles
            Examine on other traffic, hazards or distractions
            Examine on number of persons in vehicle during transit vs. when stopped
                Lack of attention to detail or observation

MEASUREMENT OF SPEED
LASER

        To my knowledge, no Colorado appellate case law has entered regarding admissibility of laser evidence, however Colorado Springs Municipal Court has addressed the subject in City v. Gutierrez, 03 M 51426 (en banc Nov. 7, 2003).  The court took judicial notice of the scientific principles as applied to the LIDAR LTI 20-20 speed detection device.  The court found the unit must be reliably calibrated within a reasonable time both before and after its operation to insure that it is functioning properly, and that this foundation may be laid through 1) the display test, 2) the self test, 3) the scope alignment test and 4) the calibration verification test, accomplished either by the fixed test or the delta distance test.  The court ruled that it was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt in the Gutierrez case that the LTI 20-20, when tested according the manufacturer's specifications and when used by a properly trained operator, is an effective, accurate and reliable method of ascertaining the speed of moving vehicles.

        Appellate case law regarding laser unit evidence admissibility varies from one state to another.

        I have not had a Colorado laser ticket proceed to trial and have not researched the operational aspects of laser units.  Lasers units can return a picture of the vehicle, including license plate and driver.  Issue may exist regarding external calibration or testing.  If laser arises in a case for which I have been retained, I would research operational aspects of the unit, including but not limited to manufacturer specifications.

TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S SURVEY
refer to link for information

CRS 42-4-1102. Altering of speed limits - required basis of a traffic investigation or survey or upon the basis of appropriate design standards and projected traffic volumes.  Refer to above link for information.

        Regulatory and advisory roadway signage must conform state law and to a manual - standardized with respect to size, color and placement.  Refer to above link for information.

ACCESS TO RECORDS - DISCOVERY FIGHTS

        Every defendant wants to know and needs to know the evidence which the prosecution has with which to prove its case.  The request and that information is called discovery.  If the case settles within parameters acceptable to the defendant, limited discovery is generally acceptable.  e.g.  copy of the summons and the law enforcement officer's notes.  If the case proceeds to trial, the standard discovery provided by prosecutors is insufficient to prepare for cross-examination.

        In County Court (state court), a discovery motion may be filed under C.R.Crim.P. 16.  Municipal courts have very different discovery rules  In either court, prosecutors will resist discovery as it is time consuming and the charge is slight.  If charged as an infraction in state court, the case will be set into Magistrate Court where the rules of discovery are abhorrent.  

        Subpoena duces tecum is available in all courts.  Depending upon the court rules, possibly court approval will be required.  So long as requested items are relevant, the court can not deny.

        Discovery may also be available:
               
CRS 24-72-201, et. seq. Colorado Open Records Act
                CRS 24-72-301, et. seq. Colorado Criminal Justice Records Act

POTENTIAL DEFENSES

        In every charge of speeding, the summons and complaint, or penalty assessment notice shall specify the speed at which the defendant is alleged to have driven and also the alleged reasonable and prudent speed applicable at the specified time and location of the alleged violation. CRS 42-4-1101(5)

        If certain defects are contained in the summons and complaint, the case may be subject to jurisdictional attack.  e.g.  Although not a jurisdictional problem, one issue noted on the page is related to the above paragraph.  Failure to provide notice of points on the traffic infraction penalty notice (speeding tickets 24 mph over the limit or less) will not affect the validity of initial charging or court case disposition, however may be used by the defendant to invalidate points for DMV suspension, revocation or denial or may be used by the defendant as a collateral attack in a driving under restraint criminal charge subsequently brought.

        When reviewing potential defenses, counsel seeks a problem with signage size and placement (notice), with the traffic engineer's survey, equipment malfunction or improper usage, or attacks the credentials or credibility of the law enforcement officer.  For additional information, refer to below links.

DMV Addresses and Links Driving Abstracts and Records DMV Point Structure On-Line Colorado Driving Records
Driver License & Hearing Defense DMV Appeal Legal Research Selected Statutes & Regs "Red" License & Interlock Devices
Insurance Actions SR-22 Insurance Habitual Traffic Offender Interstate Compact Accident Reports & DMV Forms
DMV Hearing
Defense
DMV Appeal
statute of limitations

Driving in Colorado is a constitutionally protected privilege, but nevertheless a privilege which may be lost.  Multiple statutes can cause loss of driving privileges for different driver behavior.  Drivers are entitled to a DMV hearing.  In some circumstances the right to hearing precedes potential DMV adverse action; under other Colorado traffic laws the adverse order is entered, then the driver is provided notice of the adverse action and right to request subsequent hearing.  If hearing has been held or a DMV final order has otherwise entered and the Colorado driver's license or Colorado driving privileges have been suspended, revoked or denied, the driver's remaining recourse is appeal to the District Court.  DMV appeal is subject to a statute of limitations.  Right to appeal may be lost if the driver delays.  Upon final order in the District Court, either party make take the case on appeal to the Colorado Court of Appeals.  Refer to links for information.

CSPD Accident Cold Report    due within 72 hours of accident
obtain hardcopy cold report from CSPD Police Operations Center
State of Colorado On-Line Accident Report
accident report obsolete 8/4/04 unless no officer accident report
 

INDEPENDENT SERVICE PROVIDERS
private investigators * process service * laboratories * transcription
refer to attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine

ADVICE BY LAYMEN
forewarned is forearmed
advice by unsupervised paralegals & street corner lawyers

TRAFFIC DEFENSE

DUI - DWAI - DEAC  *  Driving Under Restraint  *  No Operator's License  *  Speeding DMV DEFENSE DMV Appeal
Speed Contest - Drag Racing  *  Eluding Police  *  Hit & Run  *  Compulsory Insurance License Hearings * Point Structure * Forms
Reckless Driving - Careless Driving  *    *  Weaving - Roadways Laned for Traffic Habitual Offender  *  Interstate Compact
Minor - Alcohol Red Light - Stop Sign  *  Traffic Definitions  *  Traffic Infraction vs. Crime  *  Traffic Cams Insurance SR-22 Interlock  Driving Records
 

SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE
DO I NEED AN ATTORNEY?

 

Do I need an attorney?

Probably not.

SPEEDING
less than 25 mph over the limit
 

Unless combined with more serious alcohol charges of DUI, DEAC or DWAI, or the driving under restraint charges of DUS, DUR or DARP or the charges grouped as hit and run or unless points will cause license loss or insurance premiums will skyrocket, I generally suggest drivers not retain counsel for a speeding ticket.  Colorado Springs has enacted $10 per mile fine over the limit, and negotiated cases carry fine based upon speed initially alleged.  "Sin Tax" to fill the city coffers, so it can get a little expensive, but retaining counsel is usually not economically justifiable unless insurance premium increase is a factor.

     a.  Talking to a prosecutor or listening to a plea offer may be worthwhile before you spend the money on defense counsel.  Caveat: don't make admissions in the process of your negotiations - your statements can be used for impeachment if the case proceeds to trial.
     b.  Be aware, if you attempt negotiation with prosecutors and fail, your efforts may cause harm.  If you intend to retain counsel, do so before speaking to prosecutors.

   
  *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *
   

Do I need an attorney?

Probably time to loosen the pocket book and hire a defense attorney.

SPEEDING
25 mph over the limit or more

Charges involving higher speeds are another story - they carry 8 points to 12 points and potential for jail as well as likelihood of large insurance premium increase or potential cancellation.  Speeding 40+ over the limit carries 12 points which would cause license suspension for adult drivers.  You may retain my services or the services of another attorney, but hire defense counsel.

   

If convicted of any speeding charge, you may face increase in your insurance premiums - probably over a period of 3 - 5 years.
Contact your insurance company underwriters to learn more of the potential consequence before you speak to prosecutors or decide whether or not to hire an attorney.

ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS
SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE

     

        At the time of the first visit, a prospective client will be quoted attorney's fees and estimated costs. The quote will be honored for a period of seven (7) days, after which it is subject to change without notice if this office has not been retained.  Attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload.  Pending proposed client acceptance and payment, retainer agreement proposals are subject to withdrawal.  Attorney reserves the right to decline any case.
 
        In most circumstances, attorney initially makes an option offer of 1.) billing to be upon hourly fees, or in the alternative, 2.) quote of a settlement flat fee or a trial flat fee.  Attorney reserves the right to quote hourly fees only without a flat fee offer, or hourly and trial flat fee options only. 
ELECTION. Offered fee options will be up to the client, however client's initial election will be final.
 
        Included in attorney's primary website is a web page devoted to clear definition & understanding of free
first consultation, fees and costs, retainer agreement and terms of representation.  Additional information regarding fees & costs may be found via the links following potential quotes.

POTENTIAL FEE QUOTE
COLORADO SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE
SETTLEMENT FLAT FEE
would be deducted from trial flat fee
$650
 
NOTE: Municipal Court only - not offered in State Court due to DA policy
TRIAL FLAT FEE
settlement fee would be deducted
$3,500
 
 

I generally offer hourly fees or a settlement flat fee.  Most speeding ticket cases plea bargain and do not proceed to trial.  The settlement flat fee would be dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the case, however the above would be a common quote.  This shall neither constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate.
 

Trial flat fee would be dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the case, however the above would be a common quote.  This shall neither constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate.  

frequent trust deposit request regarding fees & costs

 

PAYMENT

Prior to commencement of representation, the attorney will quote the amount requested as a trust deposit against which attorney's fees and costs may be billed.  The requested trust deposit will be dependent upon the facts and circumstances of your case.

Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES

LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT
 
  $     650     
$       75   
 
settlement common trust deposit request
including attorney's fees & litigation costs - excluding travel
map * travel policy - time & expenses * travel rates

settlement trust deposit would be deducted from trial trust deposit
NOTE: Municipal Court only - not offered in State Court due to DA policy

 

OR

$725*

 

Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES

LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT
 
$       3,500  
$          500  
 
trial common trust deposit request
including attorney's fees & litigation costs - excluding travel
Additional cost deposit may be requested as trial preparation proceeds &
anticipated litigation expenses solidify
map * travel policy - time & expenses * travel rates

$4,000*

speeding ticket defense
* this shall not constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate

Client authorization is obtained for any large cost expense.  Final expenditure may run less or client may periodically be asked for additional amounts to be deposited to trust if fees and costs will exceed previous deposits. 

Client will be provided with a trust accounting and itemized billing statement when there has been activity on the account.  At the end of each case, a detailed accounting summary is provided and remaining trust proceeds are refunded.

trust deposit for anticipated fees & costs is due when retained

attorney does not accept installment payments

regular billings are scheduled on the 1st and 15th
if fees and costs are not paid as agreed, representation is withdrawn

 
PARTIAL LIST OF POTENTIAL COSTS
out of pocket costs are the responsibility of the client
note: costs change & below cost information may be obsolete
link to Colorado Judicial Branch website -  current costs information published by state
COLORADO STATE COURT COSTS
direct link to criminal or traffic court costs - costs change & lists may be obsolete
COUNTY COURT CRIMINAL COSTS DISTRICT COURT CRIMINAL COSTS
Price   Client Background Search
Varies   DMV Out of State Driving Record
10.00   Accident Report
20.00   Offense Report
10.00   DA Office discovery packet - estimate (actual may be more or less)
25.00   State court jury deposit - C.R.Crim.P. 23, CRS 16-10-109 (non-refundable except by acquittal)
10.00   Court records search & copy costs (actual may be more or less)
10.00   Copy expense at courthouse for prior offense files (estimate - may vary)
75.00   Public Service supervision fee
37.50   OJW fee to court (outstanding judgment warrant) - anticipating Integral Recoveries collection agency referral costs
95.00   DMV reinstatement fee
4.40   DMV clearance letter - certified copy of Colorado driving abstract
500.00   Private Investigator initial retainer - if relevant - variable based upon number of witnesses to interview
200.00   Law enforcement 911 / dispatch records, tapes & transcript - widely variable
200.00   Subpoena process service expense - depends on number of subpoenas issued
$3 per page   Transcriptionist - law enforcement 911 / dispatch audio files & investigator interview audio recordings if relevant
Varies   On-line legal research - dependent upon issues requiring legal research, if any
Rates   Travel time and expenses if the case is outside El Paso County

CAVEAT: Not all above costs will be relevant to any given case, and additional expenses not identified may be incurred in any individual case.  Costs quoted are subject to change by independent providers; actual costs paid will be billed.  limited search pricing

 
 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************
 
POTENTIAL FEE QUOTE
DOR * DMV LICENSE HEARING
SUSPENSION
  *  REVOCATION  *  DENIAL
  Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
common quote - limited flat fee

$650

this shall neither constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate
DMV limited flat fee would be dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the case

A DMV limited flat fee would likely be offered.  Additional hours necessitated by continuance requested by police or by subpoena procurement are billed at hourly rates.  A client may retain the attorney's services in a DUI or traffic criminal case without asking for assistance at DMV proceedings.  Attorney does not undertake representation in DMV proceedings until the DMV limited flat fee has been paid, and full payment is required at least *seven (7) days in advance of hearing.  Fees beyond the DMV limited flat fee would be unusual.

 

Attorney will initially make an option offer of 1.) billing to be upon hourly fees, or in the alternative, 2.) quote of a hearing flat fee per above.  Offered fee options will be up to the client, however client's initial election will be final.  Hourly fee billings are based solely upon time, and may be more or less than the offered flat fee.  Hourly fees are not capped at the limited flat fee.  Attorney reserves the right to quote hourly fees only without a flat fee offer.  Attorney reserves the right to decline any case.

 

* Applicable case law, statutes, rules of civil procedure, and Department of Revenue or Department of Health regulations contain mandatory time constraints, are complex and are generally unfavorable to the driver. The above 7 day hiring limitation is based solely upon client control over fees paid at time attorney is retained in the criminal case and upon avoidance & resolution of attorney calendar conflicts.  Prospective clients are notified 7 days is insufficient time to prepare an adequate license hearing defense which involves DMV discovery or DOR issuance of subpoena (compelling testimony) or subpoena duces tecum (compelling testimony & production of documents or evidence).  Delay in retaining attorney may prejudice the defense. Whether the underlying basis is alcohol related or not, time is critical in DOR hearings regarding suspension, revocation or denial of Colorado driving privileges.

 

DOR hearing fee Estimate Caveats.  If collateral attack is required, the attorney would need to know more about the number and locations of underlying court cases to be attacked before offering a DOR hearing fee.  Legal research and research time would increase the estimates.

 

Non-Alcohol

Alcohol

Habitual Offender

Client authorization is obtained for any large cost expense.  Final expenditure may run less or client may periodically be asked for additional amounts to be deposited to trust if fees and costs will exceed previous deposits. 

Client will be provided with a trust accounting and itemized billing statement when there has been activity on the account.  At the end of each case, a detailed accounting summary is provided and remaining trust proceeds are refunded.

trust deposit for anticipated fees & costs is due when retained

attorney does not accept installment payments

regular billings are scheduled on the 1st and 15th
if fees and costs are not paid as agreed, representation is withdrawn

 
 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************
 
First Consultation Accounting Structure Hourly Fees Costs Flat Fee - Definition
Settlement Phase Contested Phase Settlement Flat Fee Trial Flat Fee
Flat Fees - Phases Earned Compare Hourly vs Flat Fees Client's Election Final Travel Time & Expenses
Security for Fees & Costs Trust Account Withdrawal or Termination Alternatives to Private Counsel
Client Duty to Disclose Omission or Non-Disclosure Attorney Selection Retaining Gustafson Advice by Laymen

 
ATTORNEY TRADE AREA & TRAVEL
CASES OUTSIDE EL PASO COUNTY
GEOGRAPHIC DISTANCE
ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

 
Colorado is a big state
ease of internet access, email & toll free phone doesn't change that fact

Attorney is very willing to travel outside the Colorado Springs area to present or defend a case, but please be aware travel time, mileage and expense would apply.  If you are out of state or unfamiliar with Colorado geography, refer to the map to determine where Colorado Springs is located in relation to the county of your court case or hearing.

Colorado MAP

Attorney welcomes new cases.  Intent is not to be harsh or to discard potential new business, but to be practical.
 

If travel is necessary, a trust deposit would be required to cover anticipated travel time, mileage & expenses.  If it is not economically justifiable to retain my services with travel, please contact counsel in the locale of your case.

ATTORNEY TRADE AREA

COUNTIES CITIES / TOWNS     COURTS
El Paso County
 
 
Colorado Springs, Colorado Fountain, Colorado
Manitou Springs, Colorado Calhan, Colorado
 Monument, Colorado Palmer Lake, Colorado
Colorado Springs Municipal Court Fountain Municipal Court
Manitou Springs Municipal Court Calhan Municipal Court  
Palmer Lake Municipal Court State Court - El Paso County Court
Monument Municipal Court
Adams County
 
Brighton, Colorado Thornton, Colorado
                                              
Brighton Municipal Court Thornton Municipal Court
  State Court - Adams County Court
Arapahoe County
 
Littleton, Colorado Centennial, Colorado
Aurora, Colorado  
Littleton Municipal Court Centennial Municipal Court
Aurora Municipal Court State Court - Arapahoe County Court
City & County Denver
Denver, Colorado  
Denver City & County Traffic Court Denver City & County Criminal Court
Douglas County
Castle Rock, Colorado  
Castle Rock Municipal Court State Court - Douglas County Court
Elbert County
Kiowa, Colorado Simla, Colorado         
Simla Municipal Court State Court - Elbert County Court
Fremont County
 
Canon City, Colorado Florence, Colorado
   
Canon City Municipal Court Florence Municipal Court
  State Court - Fremont County Court
Jefferson County
 
Golden, Colorado  Wheat Ridge , Colorado
                                             
Golden Municipal Court Wheat Ridge Municipal Court
  State Court - Jefferson County Court
Pueblo County
Pueblo, Colorado                                           
Pueblo Municipal Court State Court - Pueblo County Court
Teller County
 
Cripple Creek, Colorado Woodland Park, Colorado
   
Cripple Creek Municipal Court Woodland Park Municipal Court
   State Court - Teller County Court

FIND A LAWYER

 

ALTERNATIVES

STATE COURTS
Refer to
early payment point reduction

Colorado Springs Municipal Court
has NOT adopted
early payment point reduction
early payment = assessment of full points charged

STATE COURTS.  Please review traffic infractions vs traffic offenses.  Unless a speeding ticket is 25+ mph over the limit in state court, it is not a criminal offense, no prosecutor is involved, plea negotiations are not available and legal counsel's only recourse to achieve relief is trial on the merits to a magistrate.

Plea negotiations are available in most Municipal Courts

 

please feel free to call or email if you are a client or are seeking representation

DISCLOSURES
Privacy
 
Notice & Disclaimer
 
Ethics & Client Disclosures
 applicable whether site visitor
reads or not

 
INITIAL CONSULTATION TERMS
not an offer for legal advice - refer to link
attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload
attorney reserves the right to decline any legal matter

PRIMARY WEBSITE

 

GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE TOPICAL WEBSITES

DUI DEFENSE - DWAI & DEAC DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE MIP - UNDERAGE ALCOHOL TRAFFIC TICKET DEFENSE DRIVING UNDER RESTRAINT SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE
HIT AND RUN DEFENSE DRIVER LICENSE DEFENSE CRIMINAL DEFENSE PROSTITUTION DEFENSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DEFENSE
SEALING CRIMINAL RECORDS NUISANCE FORFEITURE DEFENSE SHOPLIFTING - THEFT DEFENSE
FAMILY LAW DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE COLORADO DIVORCE LEGAL SEPARATION STEP-PARENT ADOPTION GRANDPARENT ADOPTION
PATERNITY - LEGAL PARENTAGE CHILD SUPPORT SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT RESTRAINING ORDERS DEBT COLLECTION PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

 MAJOR SEARCH ENGINES

All the Web AltaVista AOL Search Ask Jeeves - Teoma Bing - Microsoft Network Dogpile
Excite Google HotBot InfoSeek - Go LookSmart Lycos
Netscape Overture Search WebCrawler Yahoo!  
 

 Serving Colorado Springs Area Zip Codes

80918 80920 80919 80917 80915 80908 80132 80909 80913 80916 80921 80922 80925 80901 80902 80903 80904 80905 80906 80907 80910 80911 80912 80914 80921 80926 80928 80929 80930 80931 80933 80934 80935 80936 80937 80940 80941 80942 80943 80944 80945 80946 80947 80949 80950 80960 80962 80970 80977 80995 90997
 

Colorado Springs, Colorado, speeding ticket, defense, traffic ticket defense, traffic attorney, traffic lawyer, traffic defense attorney, traffic defense lawyer, Colorado Springs Municipal Court, Colorado state courts, statutes, municipal ordinances, law, reasonable & prudent speed, radar, vascar, laser, pace clock, speed, velocity, speed limits, preemption, traffic engineer, survey, speeding tickets, Colorado Springs Municipal Court, Colorado state courts, speeding, ticket, traffic ticket, speeding ticket, defenses, discovery, information, Colorado Springs, El Paso County, Colorado, court, lawyer, attorney, Manitou Springs Municipal Court, Woodland Park Municipal Court, Cripple Creek Creek Municipal Court, Fountain Municipal Court, Calhan Municipal Court, Simla Municipal Court, Pueblo Municipal Court, Castle Rock Municipal Court, Monument Municipal Court, Palmer Lake Municipal Court, Municipal Court Colorado Springs Colorado, Municipal Court Manitou Springs Colorado, Municipal Court Woodland Park Colorado, Municipal Court Cripple Creek Colorado, Municipal Court Fountain Colorado, Municipal Court Calhan Colorado, Court Calhan Colorado, Municipal Court Simla Colorado, Town of Simla Colorado, Court Simla Colorado, Municipal Court Pueblo Colorado, Municipal Court Castle Rock Colorado, Calhan Colorado, Simla Colorado, Municipal Court Monument Colorado, Municipal Court Palmer Lake Colorado, Municipal Court Denver Colorado, Municipal Court Aurora Colorado, Municipal Court Brighton Colorado, Municipal Court Broomfield Colorado, Municipal Court Centennial Colorado, Municipal Court Englewood Colorado, Municipal Court Federal Heights Colorado, Municipal Court Golden Colorado, Municipal Court Littleton Colorado, Municipal Court Sheridan Colorado, Municipal Court Thornton Colorado, Municipal Court Wheat Ridge Colorado, Municipal Court WheatRidge Colorado

Colorado Springs, Colorado, speeding ticket, Colorado Springs Municipal Court, defense, municipal ordinances, law, reasonable and prudent speed, radar, vascar, laser, pace clock, speed, velocity, speed limits, preemption, traffic engineer, survey, speeding tickets, Colorado state courts, traffic ticket, defenses, discovery, information, Colorado Springs, El Paso County, Colorado, court, lawyer, attorney, Manitou Springs Municipal Court, Woodland Park Municipal Court, Cripple Creek Creek Municipal Court, Fountain Municipal Court, Simla Municipal Court, Pueblo Municipal Court, Castle Rock Municipal Court, Monument Municipal Court, Palmer Lake Municipal Court, Municipal Court Colorado Springs Colorado, Municipal Court Manitou Springs Colorado, Municipal Court Woodland Park Colorado, Municipal Court Cripple Creek Colorado, Municipal Court Fountain Colorado, Municipal Court Calhan Colorado, Court Calhan Colorado, Municipal Court Simla Colorado, Town of Simla Colorado, Court Simla Colorado, Municipal Court Pueblo Colorado, Municipal Court Castle Rock Colorado, Calhan Colorado, Simla Colorado, Municipal Court Monument Colorado, Municipal Court Palmer Lake Colorado, Municipal Court Denver Colorado, Municipal Court Aurora Colorado, Municipal Court Brighton Colorado, Municipal Court Broomfield Colorado, Municipal Court Centennial Colorado, Municipal Court Englewood Colorado, Municipal Court Federal Heights Colorado, Municipal Court Golden Colorado, Municipal Court Littleton Colorado, Municipal Court Sheridan Colorado, Municipal Court Thornton Colorado, Municipal Court Wheat Ridge Colorado, Municipal Court WheatRidge Colorado

Website Copyright © 2003 - All Rights Reserved - Document Revised August 27, 2010
mountains photo image, attorney photo image & law office logo copyright © Robert D. Gustafson - all rights reserved - no copyright claimed to other images
Website Initial Publication Date: October 18, 2003 - Republication Date: January 29, 2010

Hit Counter